Skip to content
Configure workflows and automate risk-based actions
Ensure a consistent, automated and risk-based approach configured to your businesses third-party risk management processes and policies.
Workflows & Case Management
Ethixbase360’s configurable technology allows you to automate your third-party risk management workflows based on existing processes, with the ability to scale, refine and evolve as your business grows in size and complexity. Workflows can be configured to automatically detect specific events, risk levels and types and to trigger proportionate responses throughout the third-party risk management lifecycle.
Additionally, case management allows for human interactions in workflows, escalating third parties who require decisions and next steps to pre-defined ownership hierarchies while tracking open tasks through to completion. All tracked to evidence compliance.
Remove manual processes and streamline onboarding and ongoing third-party risk management
- Create business specific attributes to calculate and determine risk.
- Automate actions based on levels and types risk posed such as risk proportionate due diligence or triggering risk specific third-party engagement strategies such as questionnaires or training.
- Automatically extract information from returned due diligence measures to append third party profiles and, should risk change, trigger proportionate review.
- Set manual intervention points in workflows to facilitate decision making and create and assign tasks to track through to completion.
- Set policies to refresh compliance measures on third parties based on anniversary dates or influenced by risk level or type.
- Be confident that workflows are being consistently and automatically applied, saving your team time and providing a fully documented third- party risk management program.
Ready to get started?
Resources
Our Latest News, Case Studies, Webinars & More
Ownership Transparency and Sanctions Risk: Building a Defensible UBO Program
Ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO) has moved from a background AML requirement to a central control for sanctions compliance, export controls, and third-party risk management. Regulators increasingly expect organizations to look beyond the immediate counterparty to understand who ultimately owns or controls an entity — and to document how those conclusions were reached. [...]
Who Owns Third-Party Cyber Risk?: Five Takeaways from Our Global Webinar Series
Across our recent EMEA and APAC webinars on third-party cybersecurity risk, one message came through clearly: organizations are still grappling with ownership—but the stakes have shifted.[...]
Human Rights Due Diligence and Modern Slavery: APAC and Global Compliance Expectations
Third-party cyber risk is no longer a niche technical issue, it has become a concerning business problem with real operational and financial consequences. As supply chains grow more complex and cyber threats become more sophisticated, many organisations are asking a critical question [...]
Reputational Risk and Third-Party Exposure: Compliance Lessons from the Epstein Files
Recent disclosures linked to the Epstein case have reignited public scrutiny around reputational risk, third-party relationships, and the hidden vulnerabilities that sit beyond formal contracts [...]
Key Takeaways from Our London Roundtable: Human Rights Due Diligence in Pharma
We recently hosted a pharma-focused roundtable in partnership with Norton Rose Fulbright at their London office, bringing together senior risk and compliance professionals from across the life sciences industry. [...]